Legal Opinion

Ziegler v. Nickel

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 4, 1998No. B100335PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

Introduction

Plaintiff, Mighty Oak Trust, appeals from the order of the trial court directing Jimmy Dean Ziegler, trustee, to withdraw as attorney for the trust and engage a licensed attorney to represent the Trust in its lawsuit against defendants Earl and Thelia Nickel. After analyzing a novel issue in California, we hold the trial court’s order was proper.

Factual and Procedural Background

This action was commenced by Ziegler as trustee of the Mighty Oak Trust (Trust) alleging, as sellers of a certain mobilehome to the Trust, defendants had intentionally failed to disclose…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Moeller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  3. In Re the Unauthorized Practice of Law of EllisHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Back Acres Pure Trust v. FahnlanderNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Pillsbury v. KarmgardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Guetersloh, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2010
  2. Roberts v. LomantoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Presta v. TepperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. EHQF Trust v. S & A Capital Partners, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  5. Portico Management Group, LLC v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API