Guernsey v. West Coast Lumber Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Hayne, C.
This was an action for damages for the breach of a contract to buy lumber. The contract provided that the defendant should buy all the lumber “of good, merchantable quality” which should be manufactured by the plaintiff during the year 1888 at his mill in San Bernardino County, and contained the following clause:—
“ Said lqmber shall be of such sizes as are usually required for the market, and shall be designated by Guernsey, *250regard being had to a due variety of sizes, so as to meet the general requirements of the market, except that the company may give orders for any required sizes…
2Cited by6 opinions
- John Deere Plow Co. v. ShellabargerTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
- Nye & Nisson v. Weed Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1928
- Byron Jackson Machine Works v. DuffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Henningsen v. Tonopah & Goldfield RailroadNevada Supreme Court · 1910
- Wooten & Co. v. Bain-Adams Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.