People v. Grimmett
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Following a bench trial, defendant was convicted of possession of heroin, contrary to MCL 335.341(4)(a); MSA 18.1070(41)(4)(a). He now appeals as of right, challenging the admission of the seized heroin.
A trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress evidence will not be reversed unless it is clearly erroneous. People v Young, 89 Mich App 753, 763; 282 NW2d 211 (1979). A ruling is clearly erroneous when the reviewing court is firmly convinced that a mistake has been made. People v Goss, 89 Mich App 598, 601; 280 NW2d 608 (1979).
In the instant case, police observed defendant, a young black…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- People v. BurrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
- People v. DuganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. KalchikMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. MarlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. GuyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.