Legal Opinion

People v. Grimmett

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1980No. Docket 44402PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Per curiam

Following a bench trial, defendant was convicted of possession of heroin, contrary to MCL 335.341(4)(a); MSA 18.1070(41)(4)(a). He now appeals as of right, challenging the admission of the seized heroin.

A trial court’s ruling on a motion to suppress evidence will not be reversed unless it is clearly erroneous. People v Young, 89 Mich App 753, 763; 282 NW2d 211 (1979). A ruling is clearly erroneous when the reviewing court is firmly convinced that a mistake has been made. People v Goss, 89 Mich App 598, 601; 280 NW2d 608 (1979).

In the instant case, police observed defendant, a young black…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Davis v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. BurrellMichigan Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. DuganMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. KalchikMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. MarlandMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. People v. GuyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API