Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GEORGE W. MILLER, Judge.
On February 3, 2004, defendant filed a motion for partial reconsideration and clarification. Defendant sought reconsideration of the Court’s November 23, 2004 decision, Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United States, 63 Fed.Cl. 122 (2004), in which the court stated that the proper test for causation is the “substantial factor” test and found that plaintiff had raised genuine issues of material fact sufficient to survive summary judgment on the issue of causation. Defendant’s motion for clarification is addressed in a separate order filed this date.
Motio…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Ramsey v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1951
- California Federal Bank v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Precision Pine & Timber, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007