Legal Opinion

Household Finance Corp. v. Arlett (In Re )

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California

Decided September 1, 1982No. 19-10303PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND DECISION

LOREN S. DAHL, Bankruptcy Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS

On October 21, 1980, GORDON and TERESA ARLETT (the Debtors), purchased a Mark III Servamatic Solar Water Heater from Servamatic Solar Systems, Inc. (the Assignor), pursuant to a written contract captioned “Security Agreement (Goods-In-Home Sales)”, (the contract). The total purchase price, which included installation and a finance charge of $1,647.60, was $5,517.60. Two pertinent provisions of the contract provide:

“SECURITY. I (buyer) give you a security interest in goods described above

and

“LIENS. You…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hendy v. DinkerhoffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. M. P. Moller, Inc. v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Southern California Telephone Co. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Fratt v. WhittierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Modesto Irrigation Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Chicago v. Valley Liquors, Inc. (In Re Valley Liquors, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
  2. Wyoming State Farm Loan Board v. Farm Credit System Capital Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Wyoming State Farm Loan Board v. Farm Credit System Capital Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API