State v. Barry

Defendant Robert Barry, an active partner in Barry Motor Company of Danbury, Iowa, was convicted of violating the provisions of section 321.26, Code of Iowa, 1958, as amended. He relies principally upon two propositions for reversal. Both involve a construction of section 321.26.

Appellant first contends the State failed to sustain its burden to prove defendant guilty of the crime charged, beyond reasonable doubt, and that the verdict is contrary to the evidence. The contention is without merit. From the stipulated evidence it appears, after Robert Barry gave instructions to his employees that…