Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rugg v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 9, 1951No. Motion No. 1654Published

1DissentBrewster, J.

In passing upon the order appealed from, our power is to be applied to a review of the discretion which was exercised by the Judge of the Court of Claims in his denial of the application. We are not at liberty to consider the application de novo. If the discretion in question turned upon a reasonable basis we are thereby constrained. We are not to hear and pass upon the application. As an appellate court we are only to determine whether its denial was an abuse of the discretion which was confided a Judge of the Court of Claims and not to us. (Court of Claims Act, § 10, subd. 5.) We recognized…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Noyes & Pettingill v. HewittNew York Supreme Court · 1837
  2. Sherlock v. ManwarenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. Chergotis v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  4. Steinleger v. FrankelAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API