Legal Opinion

Weber v. Town of Saukville

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 25, 1995No. 94-2336PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.

Payne & Dolan, Inc. appeals a summary judgment order in favor of the respondents, ruling that a conditional use permit for mineral extraction was invalid because it authorized activities not allowed under the Town of Saukville Zoning Code (code), specifically, blasting and crushing. The court also found that Saukville had not followed procedures in the code relating to the application process and the public notice requirement.

The respondents, who are residents of Saukville (Residents), cross-appeal the court's denial of summary judgment on the grounds that more than thirty residences are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ball v. District No. 4, Area BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. City of Racine v. J-T Enterprises of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Department of Revenue v. Nagle-Hart, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State v. DekkerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  5. Seep v. State Personnel CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Weber v. Town of SaukvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API