Legal Opinion

Weber v. Town of Saukville

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1997No. 94-2336PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnn Walsh Bradley, J.

¶ 1. The defendant, Payne & Dolan, Inc. (Payne & Dolan), seeks review of a published decision of the court of appeals, which affirmed a circuit court summary judgment in favor of plaintiff residents (plaintiffs) of the Town of Saukville (the Town). Payne & Dolan challenges the court of appeals' conclusion that the Town's zoning ordinance does not authorize a conditional use permit for blasting and crushing in a quarrying operation. The plaintiffs assert that the ordinance prohibits the quarrying operation because of the number of families residing within the area. Because we determine that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. MartinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State Ex Rel. Auchinleck v. Town of LaGrangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Lake City Corp. v. City of MequonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Gerrard Realty Corp. v. American States InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Marris v. City of CedarburgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bruno v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Wisconsin Citizens Concerned for Cranes & Doves v. Wisconsin Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hirschhorn v. Auto-Owners InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Orion Flight Services, Inc. v. Basler Flight ServiceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  5. McConkey v. Van HollenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API