Legal Opinion

Bautista v. Wetzel

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 11, 2023No. 1:21-cv-00126Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA NOEL BAUTISTA, : Plaintiff : No. 1:21-cv-00126 : v. : (Judge Kane) : JESSICA CAREY, : Defendant : MEMORANDUM Presently before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment filed pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. No. 51.) Also before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery. (Doc. No. 54.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny Plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery, and the Court will grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. I. INTRODUCTION Pro se…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Wilson v. SeiterSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API