Legal Opinion

Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Public Service Commission

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 29, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Casey, J.

Although these proceedings involve some complex issues, the basis for the proceedings is straightforward. Having formerly *424been the exclusive provider of electricity at retail to respondent Alcan Aluminum Corporation, doing business as Alcan Rolled Products Company (hereinafter Alcan), petitioner objects to the approval by respondent Public Service Commission (hereinafter the PSC) of the request of respondent Sithe/ Independent Power Partners, L. P. (hereinafter Sithe) to sell electricity to Alcan at a retail price less than the PSC-approved rate at which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Public Service Commission v. Rochester Telephone Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Hinman, Straub, Pigors & Manning, P. C. v. BroderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. People Ex Rel. Cayuga Power Corp. v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  5. Poliandro v. PoliandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. S.E. Iowa Cooperative Electric Ass'n v. Iowa Utilities BoardSupreme Court of Iowa · 2001
  2. Luyster Creek, LLC v. New York State Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. SE IOWA CO-OP. ELEC. v. Iowa Util. Bd.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API