Legal Opinion

Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Public Service Commission

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 2, 1987PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*367OPINION OF THE COURT

Simons, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding in which petitioner Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation challenges an order of respondent Public Service Commission. The order directed Niagara Mohawk to refund to its ratepayers moneys collected during 1977-1981 for charges imposed pursuant to the fuel adjust*368ment clause in the Niagara Mohawk rate tariff. The Commission’s action followed its determination that a portion of the company’s expenses for fuel during those years had been imprudently incurred. The Appellate Division annulled the order, finding the refund illegal because…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Chicago & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. WellmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. West Ohio Gas Co. v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Abrams v. Public Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Campo Corp. v. FeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Knight-Ridder Broadcasting, Inc. v. GreenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Daily Advertiser v. TRANS-LA, ETC.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Rochester Gas & Electric Corp. v. PubLic Service CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Porr v. NYNEX Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  5. Centerpoint Energy Entex v. Railroad Commission, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API