Legal Opinion
Brendan Ngehsi Newanforbi v. Diana Candelaria, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 15, 2026No. 2:26-cv-00983Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRENDAN NGEHSI NEWANFORBI, Case No. 2:26-cv-00983-DC-CSK (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 DIANA CANDELARIA, et al., (ECF Nos. 4, 5) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Brendan Ngehsi Newanforbi is representing himself in this action.1 18 Plaintiff initiated this action on March 19, 2026 and applied for leave to proceed in forma 19 pauperis (“IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) Because Plaintiff’s 20 affidavit was insufficient, the Court denied Plaintiff’s IFP…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.