Legal Opinion

State v. Sturgill, Unpublished Decision (12-6-2004)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 6, 2004No. Case No. CA2004-02-008UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, the state of Ohio, appeals a decision of the Clermont County Court of Common Pleas, sustaining the objection of defendant-appellee, Sarah Sturgill, based on the corpus delicti rule, to the admission of her confession into evidence. We reverse the decision of the trial court and remand this matter for further proceedings.

{¶ 2} The following evidence was adduced at trial. Colleen Sturgill is the grandmother of two and a half-year-old M.S. and her younger brother. Clermont County Department of Job and Family Services ("CCDJFS") had placed the children in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. SageOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. IssaOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. BarnesOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. Van HookOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. MarandaOhio Supreme Court · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. State v. FlucasOhio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API