Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jagodzinski

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 14, 1999PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD ELLIOTT, J.:

¶ 1 In this appeal, the Commonwealth alleges trial court error in admitting John Jagodzinski (“Jagodzinski”) into the Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition (“ARD”) program over the Commonwealth’s objection. Finding trial court error, we are constrained to reverse. The relevant factual and procedural history of this rather novel case follows.

¶ 2 Following his arrest for driving under the influence, Jagodzinski elected to apply for ARD. An applicant for ARD in Erie County must complete an application, which includes the following question:

8. A. Have you ever been found guilty…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Commonwealth v. BennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Commonwealth v. BelvilleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SohnleitnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Commonwealth v. FlemingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. Com. v. McCabe, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Com. v. Jenkins, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023
  5. Com. v. Jenkins, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API