Legal Opinion

Hydro Systems, Inc v. Factory Automation Systems, Inc

District Court, N.D. Georgia

Decided March 10, 2025No. 1:23-cv-03492Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ATLANTA DIVISION HYDRO SYSTEMS, INC., a California company, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-03492-VMC v. FACTORY AUTOMATION SYSTEMS, INC., a Georgia company, Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on cross-motions for partial summary judgment. (Docs. 29, 30). For the reasons that follow, the Court will grant Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Factory Automation Systems, Inc.’s (“FAS”) motion and grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff/Counterclaim…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Hickson Corp. v. Northern Crossarm Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  5. Allen v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API