Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Sporn

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 7, 2017No. AC38387Published

1Opinion of the CourtKeller, J.

The respondent, Judith B. Sporn, appeals from the judgment of the trial court suspending her from the practice of law for violating several Rules of Professional Conduct and Practice Book § 2-27. She claims on appeal that the court abused its discretion by: (1) granting the motion in limine of the petitioner, Disciplinary Counsel, seeking to preclude proposed expert testimony on the subject of immigration law; and (2) imposing a two year suspension. We affirm the judgment of the court.

This appeal arises from three grievance actions commenced against the respondent in 2013 and 2014. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Burton v. MottoleseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. Statewide Grievance Committee v. ShlugerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  3. Gianetti v. NORWALK HOSP.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
  4. Commissioner v. Towpath AssociatesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. Statewide Grievance Committee v. SpirerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API