Legal Opinion

Shaw v. Lord

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 13, 1914No. 3250PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Brror from District Court, Be Flore County; Malcolm B. Rosser, Judge. Action by Anna Lord against John Shaw. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

THACKER, C.

Plaintiff in error will be designated as defendant, and defendant in error as plaintiff, in accord with their respective titles in the trial court.

On July 1, 1905, defendant, a deputy United States marshal; and Bert True, a posseman, having a warrant duly authorizing them to do so, undertook the arrest of Joseph Smith, who was a fugitive from justice, charged with a felony, and who was believed by defendant to be so dangerous that he might kill an officer trying to arrest him, unless he realized the latter had a clear advantage of him, and that resistance would be futile.

T…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morris v. PlattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1864
  2. Macomber v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Brown v. KendallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1850
  4. Pickens v. Coal River Boom & Timber Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. GeeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Day v. State Ex Rel. Utah Department of Public SafetyUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Askay v. MaloneyOregon Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Bartosh v. BanningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Askay v. MaloneyOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Aiken v. Shell Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API