Legal Opinion

Cox v. Stollenwerck

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 28, 1925No. 3 Div. 692PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

This court has repeatedly held that, in equity as well as law, when the evidence before the trial court is ore tenus, or partly so, the trial court had the benefit of seeing and hearing the witnesses, and therefore possessed an advantage over this court in weighing and considering the same, and its judgment or decree was like unto the verdict of a jury, and would not be disturbed unless the result was plainly and palpably contrary to the great weight of the evidence. Senior v. State, 205 Ala. 337, 87 So. 592; Fitzpatrick v. Stringer, 200 Ala. 374, 76 So. 932; Ray v. Watkins, 203 Ala. 683, 85…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ray v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Fitzpatrick v. StringerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  3. Deavors v. Southern Express Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1917
  4. Senior v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cook v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  2. Franklin v. ScottSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. Copeland Bros. Realty Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  4. Mahaffey v. McNicollIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API