Legal Opinion

Stowell v. Rialto Irrigation District

California Supreme Court

Decided September 26, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 7866Published

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

A former judgment of reversal in this case was set aside on petition for rehearing in order that further consideration might be given to the contentions of the defendant. Upon such further consideration we are unable to arrive at a different conclusion.

Two actions were brought by plaintiff based on amounts claimed to be due on interest coupons detached from certain bonds of the defendant Irrigation District. The defense was made on the ground that the issuance of said bonds was unauthorized by law; that the consideration, if any, for the issuance thereof was insufficient, inadequate, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rialto Irr. Dist. v. StowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1917
  2. Ham v. Grapeland Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Stowell v. Rialto Irrigation Dist.California Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API