In re Sealed Case
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
The district court denied appellant’s motion for downward departure under'section 5K1.1 of the United States Sentencing Guidelines because the Government had not filed a motion attesting to appellant’s substantial assistance. Applying Koon v. United States, 518 U.S. 81, 116 S.Ct. 2035, 135 L.Ed.2d 392 (1996), and finding nothing in the Sentencing Guidelines flatly prohibiting departures in the absence of government motions, we remand for the district court to determine whether the circumstances of this ease take it out of the relevant heartland so as to warrant departure.
I
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- United States v. Hitham Abuhouran A/K/A Steve HouranCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- In Re Sealed Case No. 97-3112Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- United States v. SolisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Evin Alexi Licona-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Charles E. Rashid (99-2141) Jack Rashid (99-2494)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.