Legal Opinion
Augustine Medical, Inc. v. Progressive Dynamics, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 25, 1999No. 98-1364PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
GAJARSA, Circuit Judge.
Augustine Medical, Inc.. (“Augustine”) appeals from the March 28, 1997 grant of summary judgment to Progressive Dynamics, Inc. (“Progressive”) by the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota dismissing Augustine’s claims of patent infringement. See Augustine Med., Inc. v. Progressive Dynamics, Inc., No. 4-96-CV-345 (D.Minn. March 28, 1997). After concluding that the district court correctly construed the language of the Settlement Agreement between the two parties, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment.
BACKGROUND
I. 1993…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- A.C. Aukerman Company v. R.L. Chaides Construction Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Pall Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Micron Separations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Met-Coil Systems Corporation v. Korners Unlimited, Inc. And Ductmate Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. And Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Defendants/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Donnay v. BoulwareSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dietrich v. Trek Bicycle Corp.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2003
- Smelser v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Augustine Medical, Inc. v. Progressive DynamicsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Raytheon Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011