Legal Opinion

United States v. Longshore

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided July 29, 2009No. Civil Action No. RWT-08-1797. Criminal Action No. RWT-06-051PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROGER W. TITUS, District Judge.

Petitioner Reginald Anthony Longshore (“Longshore”) has moved to correct his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2255. The Court originally sentenced Longshore as a career offender under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines § 4B1.1, because he had two prior felony convictions for drug offenses and one prior felony conviction for a violent crime. Since his federal sentencing, Maryland state courts have vacated two of Longshore’s predicate felony convictions. Longshore contends that he no longer qualifies as a career offender and seeks a new sentencing hearing…

2Cases cited19 opinions

Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
Bay Area Laundry & Dry Cleaning Pension Trust Fund v. Ferbar Corp. of California, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
Daniels v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
Anthony Aron v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Simard v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2019