Legal Opinion

Ruth M. Couch v. Margaret Rose Donahue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 26, 1958No. 17111_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WISDOM, Circuit Judge.

A reversal is sought in this appeal because of the trial court’s instructions to the jury on the effect of a violation of a traffic ordinance. Alabama law controls the case.

Mrs. Ruth Couch sued Miss Margaret Donahue for damages for personal injuries she received when the defendant ran her automobile into the rear end of the automobile in which the plaintiff was riding. Mrs. Couch and her husband, who was driving their car, were traveling north on U. S. Highway 231, about ten miles north of Pell City, St. Clair County, Alabama. Donahue, driving her car, was following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McCaleb v. ReedSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Keller v. Brooklyn Bus CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  3. Simpson v. GlennSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Murphree v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Mandro v. VibbertCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Senn v. Alabama Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Senn v. Alabama Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API