Legal Opinion
Petition of Blake
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 27, 1991No. 73 E.D. Misc. Dkt. 1991PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*458ORDER
2Per curiam 1
AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 1991, the petition is denied. Opinions to follow.
OPINION OF THE COURT
3Per curiam 2
This petition arises in the context of the most recent in a series of efforts to reform the courts of Philadelphia. Due to serious and ongoing fiscal and administrative problems in the Philadelphia courts, and the apparent inability or unwillingness of that system to correct the growing deficiencies, this court designated two of its own members to oversee the Philadelphia court system. By order dated December 19, 1990, we unanimously appointed Mr. Justice Papadakos to oversee the budgetary…
4Cited by13 opinions
- Official Capacity as Court Administrator of Pennsylvania Alex Bonavitacola, Honorable, Individually and in His Official Capacity as President Judge, Court of Common Pleas Esther Sylvester, Honorable, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Judge, Court of Common Pleas Family Division Vincent Fumo, Honorable, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Pennsylvania State Senator Joseph Diprimio, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Deputy Court Administrator Family Division, Domestic Relations Branch Robert Brady, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Chairman, Democratic City Committee John Morris, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Secretary Treasurer of Teamsters Local Union No. 115 Geoff GallasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Gallas v. Supreme Court of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Sourovelis v. City of PhiladelphiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- Callahan v. City Of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- In Re Assignment of AvellinoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.