Legal Opinion

Melanie Webster v. Walgreen Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 4, 2012No. 55A01-1110-CT-442PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRONE, Judge.

Case Summary

Melanie Webster filed a complaint against Walgreen Co. by certified mail. Her first attempt at mailing the complaint was returned due to insufficient postage. By the time Webster resent and filed the complaint, the statute of limitations had run. Webster filed a motion to amend the filing date of her complaint to the date that she had originally sent the complaint, which was within the statute of limitations. The trial court denied the motion and thereafter granted Walgreen judgment on the pleadings because the complaint was untimely. Webster appeals the denial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Georgos v. JacksonIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Boostrom v. BachIndiana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Comer v. GohilIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Newman v. JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER ASSN.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. v. CroninIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Natasha F. Hortenberry v. Thomas PalmerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Ann L. Miller and Richard A. Miller v. Glenn L. Dobbs, D.O., and Partners in HealthIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
  3. Ann L. Miller and Richard A. Miller v. Glenn L. Dobbs, D.O., and Partners in HealthIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API