Legal Opinion

ACME BOOT CO. v. MONTENEGRO

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 22, 1993No. 08-93-00017-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LARSEN, Justice.

Employer/defendant Acme Boot Company appeals from a judgment for plaintiff/employee Salvador Montenegro following a jury trial. The jury found that Acme discharged Montenegro for exercising his rights under Texas Workers’ Compensation Act, a violation of Tex.Rev.Civ.StatAnn. art. 8307c (Vernon Pamph.1993); that the discharge was willful and malicious; and awarded plaintiff $40,000 actual and $100,000 exemplary damages. Acme complains that the evidence does not support the jury’s verdict, that the amount of exemplary damages was excessive, and that the trial court should…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Alamo National Bank v. KrausTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Stafford v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Lofton v. Texas Brine Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Trussell, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
  2. Continental Coffee Products Co. v. Cazarez, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1995
  3. Casteel v. Crown Life Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999
  4. Pacesetter Corp. v. Barrickman, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1994
  5. Acme Boot Co., Inc. v. Montenegro, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API