Legal Opinion
Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Phoenix Assurance Co.
District Court, S.D. Illinois
Decided August 4, 1997No. 95-CV-4001-JLFPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FOREMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is a “Motion for Partial Summary Judgment Under the DIC Policies For Losses Related to Watercraft” filed by defendant Phoenix Assurance Company of New York and Commonwealth Insurance Company pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 (Doc. 85). Defendants Navigators Insurance Company and Albany Insurance Company have joined in this motion. Archer Daniels Midland Company and its subsidiaries (collectively, “ADM”) have filed a response (Doc. 120) and defendants have filed a Reply (Doc. 124). This Court has jurisdiction over this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- R.E. Wood, Jr. And Julie Wood v. Mid-Valley IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp. v. Protection Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
- Travelers Insurance Companies v. Penda CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Port of Seattle v. Lexington Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Port of Seattle v. Lexington InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- American Family Mutual Insurance v. Continental Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- GTE Corp. v. Allendale Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Carrier v. RLI InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.