Legal Opinion

Elliot v. . Tyson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In this action the parties settled their matters by paying and receiving from each other, according to the contract. At the conclusion of the trial the court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant for costs only, and the defendant appealed. When nothing is involved except costs, an appeal will not be allowed. Clark's Code, 560; Futrell v. Deans, ante, 38. When the subject matter of the action has been lost, destroyed or adjusted between the parties, an appeal will not be allowed for costs only. (185)S. v. Byrd, 93 N.C. 624.

Cited: S. c., 117 N.C. 114; Herring…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Elliott v. . TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cochran v. . RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API