Legal Opinion
Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Rose
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided January 7, 1892No. 78PublishedCited by 12 opinions
From the Allen Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
New, J. —
This was an action by the appellant to recover of the appellees the price of a clover huller, alleged to have been sold and delivered by the former to the latter.
A written order for the machine was given by the appellees, as follows:
“Fort Wayne, October 25,1888.
“ The undersigned,, residing in Allen county, State of Indiana, this day order of Gaar, Scott & Co., Richmond, Indiana, through--, agent, one No. 1 Gaar, Scott & Co. Clover Huller, Elevator and Recleaner Side, for which we agree to pay $470 and freight from Richmond, Indiana. Terms as follows: Cash on or before delivery —…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Rogers v. LeydenIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Cruzan v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. TrowbridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Manning v. GasharieIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- Lockwood v. RoseIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. KennedyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Indianapolis Union Railway Co. v. NeubacherIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
- Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. WeikleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
- Estate of Reeves v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
- Jasper County Farms Co. v. HoldenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.