Legal Opinion

Smith v. General Motors Acceptance Corporation

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 20, 1959No. 37500PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nichols, Judge.

Since a motion for a directed verdict is a prerequisite to a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict under Code (Ann.) § 110-113, where there has been no legal motion for a directed verdict a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict cannot be considered. Durden v. Henderson, 212 Ga. 807, 808 (96 S. E. 2d 362); Southwind Trucking Co. v. Harvey, 96 Ga. App. 715 (1) (101 S. E. 2d 223). Accordingly, the first question for decision is whether there was a legal motion for a directed verdict made in the trial court.

“There can be no- such thing as a verdict ini any…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McBean v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Anthony v. AnthonySupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Durden v. HendersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1957
  4. Groves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  5. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. American Appraisal Company v. Whitley Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  2. Borochoff Properties, Inc. v. Howard Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  3. Undercofler v. Foote & Davies, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Carter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Wood v. SheppardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API