Bergman v. Monarch Construction Co.
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCupp, J.
{¶ 1} We are asked to determine whether, in an employee-initiated enforcement action, the penalties set forth in R.C. 4115.10(A) are mandatory penalties that must be imposed against a party found to have violated the prevailing-wage law if the violation has not resulted from the exceptions specified in R.C. 4115.13(C). We conclude that the penalties in the foregoing circumstance are mandatory. Accordingly, we reverse the court of appeals’ judgment and remand this matter to the trial court for further proceedings.
I
{¶ 2} Monarch Construction Company, appellee, a general contractor, entered into…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Dorrian v. Scioto Conservancy DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. Evans v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. Musial v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 2005
- Harris v. Van HooseOhio Supreme Court · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hamer v. Danbury Twp. Bd. of Zoning AppealsOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Ohio Valley Associated Bldrs. & Contrs. v. Rapier Elec., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
- Ohio Valley Associated Builders & Contractors v. Industrial Power Systems, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Ohio Valley Associated Builders & Contractors v. Rapier Electric, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2011
- State ex rel. Cordray v. Evergreen Land Dev., Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.