Legal Opinion
Rochlis v. Walt Disney Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 14, 1993No. B066993PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
The plaintiff and appellant, Jeffrey A. Rochlis (Rochlis) appeals from a summary judgment entered against him on his four-count first amended complaint. He had sued the defendants and respondents, The Walt Disney Company (Disney), Walt Disney Imagineering (WDI) and Martin A. Sklar (Sklar) (collectively, the defendants) for damages arising out of his employment by Disney and WDI and the subsequent termination of that employment in 1989. Rochlis argues that summary judgment was improper because material issues of fact remain to be resolved with respect to each of his four…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Shoemaker v. MyersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Lojek v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Shapiro v. Wells Fargo Realty AdvisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Turner v. Anheuser-Busch, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Philip Williamson Itzik Riefronda Kirlin Thomas Painter,plaintiffs-Appellants v. General Dynamics Corporation,opinionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Scott v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1995
- Patrick H. King v. Ac & R Advertising Saatchi & Saatchi Company Plc Alvin Chereskin Harry J. KoenigCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Williams v. WraxallCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.