Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lasell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 21, 1943No. 46250Published

1DissentSmith', J.

(dissenting) — There is no substantial dispute in the record as to the material facts bearing on the question of contributory negligence. I am compelled to dissent from the conclusion of the majority on that question. I think there should have been a directed verdict for defendant and that all discussion of the alleged errors urged by appellant is immaterial and unnecessary.

Plaintiff herself testifies:

“When we went into the Des Moines Theater I was ushered to my seat by an usher there. He had a flashlight. It cast a light on the floor so you could see to get to the seat. * * * We didn’t get…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Flury v. Central Publishing House of Reformed Church in the United StatesOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Rice v. Goodspeed Real Estate Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Ware v. Evangelical Baptist Benevolent & Missionary SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  4. Seabridge v. PoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
  5. Sanderson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API