Lasell v. Tri-States Theatre Corp.
Supreme Court of Iowa
1DissentSmith', J.
(dissenting) — There is no substantial dispute in the record as to the material facts bearing on the question of contributory negligence. I am compelled to dissent from the conclusion of the majority on that question. I think there should have been a directed verdict for defendant and that all discussion of the alleged errors urged by appellant is immaterial and unnecessary.
Plaintiff herself testifies:
“When we went into the Des Moines Theater I was ushered to my seat by an usher there. He had a flashlight. It cast a light on the floor so you could see to get to the seat. * * * We didn’t get…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Flury v. Central Publishing House of Reformed Church in the United StatesOhio Supreme Court · 1928
- Rice v. Goodspeed Real Estate Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931
- Ware v. Evangelical Baptist Benevolent & Missionary SocietyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Seabridge v. PoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
- Sanderson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.