People v. Marble
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
The defendant was charged by indictment with the grand theft of five bonds of the value of $4,100, the property of Susie Biddleeom. He appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on the court’s findings, a jury trial having been duly waived. He also appeals from the order denying his motion for a new trial.
The principal contention on the appeal is that the evidence does not justify the finding of guilt.
We are satisfied that the conviction is sustained by the following facts: In March, 1932, one Robldns had sold to Mrs. Biddleeom five $1,000 bonds of the Casa Real Apartments in Los Angeles…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. TedescoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- People v. SchwabCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- People v. PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. SofferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- People v. BeattyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.