Legal Opinion

Simms v. Miears

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 29, 1916No. 5715PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRice, J.

Defendant in error Miears brought this suit for partition of three certain tracts of land in Caldwell county against E. V. Simms, D. C. Simms, Matthew Simms, Vinie Simms, Nathaniel Simms, Lee .Simms, and Ida and Henrietta Petty, the last two of whom are minors, making the usual allegations necessary in such suits. At a former term of the court defendant in error acquired by purchase at a foreclosure sale the interest of E. V. Simms in said land.

None of the plaintiffs in error (defendants below) having answered, judgment went against them by default; and the court having found that the land…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Crenshaw v. HempelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Durham v. BettertonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Duke v. SpillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Texas Central Railway Co. v. WallerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. AlbrightTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Smith v. Buckholts State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  3. National Ben Franklin Fire Ins. Co. v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  4. Southern Oil Corp. v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1921
  5. Moran Oil & Gas Co. v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API