Legal Opinion
Zwickler v. Koota
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided February 13, 1967No. 66-C-375PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZAVATT, Chief Judge.
On the motion of the plaintiff, a three-judge court was convened, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2284. The plaintiff seeks an order enjoining the defendant from prosecuting him under section 781-b1 of the New York Penal Law, McKinney’s Con-sol.Laws, c. 40, which the plaintiff contends is violative of the First Amendment as made applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. The defendant has made a cross-motion to dismiss the amended complaint upon the grounds (1) that this court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction and (2) that the amended complaint fails to state a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Landry v. DaleyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1968
- Brooks v. BrileyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1967
- Zwickler v. KootaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Shaw v. GarrisonDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.