Legal Opinion

Dame v. Company

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 4, 1948No. 3731Published

1Per curiam

The time required to take a party’s deposition is not always limited to an hour, and often a substantially longer time is necessary. If the defendant were to take one or more depositions at nine o’clock in the morning, the plaintiff might be deprived of the opportunity to take his depositions at ten o’clock on the same morning. This is true whether the defendant’s depositions were to be taken in Dover at his office, as his notice stated, or at Exeter as he later offered to do. If the practice advocated by the defendant should prevail, there would be nothing to prevent either party, within the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morrill v. Amoskeag Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  2. Lacoss v. LebanonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1917
  3. Carr v. AdamsSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API