Legal Opinion
Morrill v. Amoskeag Savings Bank
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided November 7, 1939No. 3101PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWoodbury, J.
It has for many years been the rule in this state that, in the absence of a statute, the test of the validity of a form of procedure is not the date of its invention (Walker v. Walker, 63 N. H. 321, 326), but whether or not it is what justice and convenience require. LaCoss v. Lebanon, 78 N. H. 413, 417, and cases cited; Hoyt v. Insurance Co., 80 N. H. 27, 30; Watkins v. Railroad, 81 N. H. 363, 367; Derosier v. Company, 82 N. H. 405, 406; Parker-Young Co. v. State, 83 N. H. 551, 560; Wisutskie v. Malouin, 88 N. H. 242, 243. It is not necessary, however, for us to consider the legality of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kilpatrick v. . Germania Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Adams v. . Irving National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Joannin v. OgilvieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- Bither v. PackardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
3Cited by20 opinions
- Fruhauf Southwest Garment Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- Urban Plumbing & Heating Co., an Oregon Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Frank B. Abbadessa v. Moore Business Forms, Inc., Robert D. Mariotti v. Moore Business Forms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Noddin v. NoddinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- City of Miami v. KoryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.