Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Rosenberg
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided May 8, 1933PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, S.
Applicants claim compensation from the estate of Charles Rosenberg, deceased, for services' rendered to four of the ten distributees named in the will of the decedent, on the assumption that such services were of value to the estate.
It appears from the petition, the records in the surrogate’s office and the testimony of Harry R. LHowe, one of the applicants, that a proceeding was begun in June, 1920, to compel the executors and trustees to account; that an order was thereafter, entered consolidating such proceeding with a proceeding for a voluntary accounting, and that a decree was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Devin v. . PatchinNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
- In re the Final Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- In re RabellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
- In re the Judicial Settlement of Account of Proceedings of VorndranNew York Surrogate's Court · 1928
- In Re the Accounting of RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Thomas v. PeyserCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Bennett v. LundellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- In re the Estate of GellerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Accounting of GravesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
- In re McCanlissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.