Legal Opinion

Hakki v. Faux

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1964No. 10184PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonough, justice.

Plaintiff, charged by complaint with a misdemeanor, resisted trial before a judge of the Third Judicial District, filing a motion for change of place of trial on the *133basis of a belief of bias or prejudice. The motion was denied and the matter set for trial. She now seeks an extraordinary writ prohibiting that judge, Honorable Merrill C. Faux, from proceeding with the trial.

The case was begun by the prosecution in the District Court by a complaint1 alleging a violation of U.C.A.1953, 76-39-5, despite the command of U.C.A.1953, 77-16-1:

“All public offenses triable in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Watkins v. SimondsUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. McIntyreUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Hardy v. MeadowsUtah Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State v. TelfordUtah Supreme Court · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SosaUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Salt Lake City v. WeinerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  3. State v. CooleyUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Hakki v. FauxUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  5. State v. CooleyUtah Supreme Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API