Legal Opinion

State v. Ramirez

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided December 6, 2001No. 13-00-769-CRPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HINOJOSA, Justice.

The State appeals from the trial court’s order granting the motion for shock probation of appellee, Fabian Ramirez. In a single issue, the State contends the trial court did not have authority to grant appellee’s motion for shock probation because appellee was not eligible for such probation. Appellee has filed a motion to dismiss, contending this Court does not have jurisdiction to consider this appeal. We grant appellee’s motion and dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Appellee pleaded guilty before a jury to two counts of sexual assault of a child. 1 The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heath v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  3. Ex Parte FierroCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
  4. Ex Parte AustinCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wiley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  2. State v. Posey, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  3. State v. Dunbar, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2008
  4. In Re State Ex Rel. De Leon, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
  5. State v. Waller, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2003

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API