San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency v. S. G.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
AARON, J.
—S.G. and Bernardo L. (together, the parents) and their son, B.L., all appeal following the jurisdictional and dispositional hearing in B.L.’s juvenile dependency case. The parents contend that the court erred in denying them reunification services. Additionally, Bernardo contends that the court erred in denying him visitation, and S.G. maintains that the court erred in allowing her only one visit per month. B.L. joins in the parents’ contentions. We affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
A
The First Dependency Case
In early January 2009, the San Diego County Health and Human Services Agency (the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Nolan W.California Supreme Court · 2009
- Napa County Department of Health & Human Services v. Shanon K.California Court of Appeal · 2012
- In re DavidCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
3Cited by11 opinions
- Melissa R. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- A.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- J.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Orange County Social Services Agency v. Z.G.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- Angel S. v. Super. Ct. CA5California Court of Appeal · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.