In the Interest of N. T., a Child

Boggs, Judge.

The father of now seven-year-old N. T. appeals from the juvenile court order terminating his parental rights to the child. We hold that termination of the father’s parental rights was premature, and therefore reverse.

In considering the [father]’s appeal, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the juvenile court’s disposition and determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found by clear and convincing evidence that the [father]’s right to custody should have been terminated. We neither weigh the evidence nor determine the credibility of any witnesses, but…