Ex Parte Montgomery
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Applicant has filed this post-conviction application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to Article 11.07, Y.A.C.C.P., challenging the implementation of a Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, (hereinafter TDCJ-ID), policy which affects his parole eligibility. We filed and set this application to decide whether discontinuing the practice of restoring an inmate’s forfeited good conduct time credits denies due process and equal protection of the law to those who had time credits forfeited but not restored when the policy went into effect. 1
Applicant was convicted…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Kentucky Department of Corrections v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by35 opinions
- Hallmark v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
- Ex Parte DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Bohannan v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Rodriguez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Martin v. Texas Board of Criminal Justice, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.