Legal Opinion

United States v. Clearfield State Bank

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 7, 1974No. Nos. 73-1703, 73-1774PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Circuit Judge.

The question presented by this consolidated appeal and application for a writ of mandamus is whether a district court’s order granting summary judgment is a final judgment.

In 1963 the M & S Construction & Engineering Company (taxpayer) borrowed funds from appellee Clearfield State Bank to finance a construction project, giving promissory notes for the loans. Taxpayer subsequently became insolvent, was unable to complete its work, and defaulted on its notes. At the same time it was indebted to appellant United States, one of approximately twenty creditors, for failure to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. IndrelunasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. United States v. D. W. Evans and Edith EvansCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Rr Village Association, Inc., Jay Stanleigh and Authur L. Penzel, Plaintiffs v. Denver Sewer Corporation and Town of Roxbury (New York)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  2. Laidley v. McClainCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. TorresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  4. Clough v. RushCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  5. In Re Cendant Corporation Securities Litigation. Sheldon Danuff, Skat Capital Lp and Joel D. ZychickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API