Legal Opinion

ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 14, 2009No. 970806226; A121145PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, P. J.

Plaintiffs (collectively, Zidell) and defendants (collectively, London) petition this court to reconsider its decision in this case. ZRZ Realty v. Beneficial Fire and Casualty Ins., 222 Or App 453, 194 P3d 167 (2008). We deny Zidell’s petition without discussion, but allow London’s petition in order to modify two aspects of our original decision.

Our decision in this case resolved, among other assignments of error, London’s contention that the trial court should have granted its motion to dismiss Zidell’s claims under ORCP 54 B(2) because Zidell’s acts were, as a matter of law, expected or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. Exxon Corp. v. YouellSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. ZRZ Realty Co. v. Beneficial Fire & Casualty InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Hunters Ridge Condominium Ass'n v. Sherwood Crossing, LLCCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  3. Certain Underwriters v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  4. State v. SteffensCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London & Excess Insurance v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API