Legal Opinion

Pitkavish v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 5, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LORD, Senior Judge.

James Pitkavish petitions this Court for review of a Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) order affirming the referee’s decision to dismiss his penalties petition as well as employer Pullman Standard’s review petition.1

Pitkavish suffered a neck injury on January 16, 1980 while in the course of his employment with Pullman Standard (Pullman). A notice of compensation payable was filed on February 4, 1980. On May 28, 1990, Pullman filed a review petition alleging that it was not responsible for payment of a $165.00 psychotherapy bill Pitkavish submitted to it because…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Buczynski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  3. Hilton Hotel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Kitchen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Battiste v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Stiner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API