Pitkavish v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
LORD, Senior Judge.
James Pitkavish petitions this Court for review of a Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) order affirming the referee’s decision to dismiss his penalties petition as well as employer Pullman Standard’s review petition.1
Pitkavish suffered a neck injury on January 16, 1980 while in the course of his employment with Pullman Standard (Pullman). A notice of compensation payable was filed on February 4, 1980. On May 28, 1990, Pullman filed a review petition alleging that it was not responsible for payment of a $165.00 psychotherapy bill Pitkavish submitted to it because…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Buczynski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
- Hilton Hotel Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. Bethlehem Mines Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Kitchen v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Battiste v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Stiner v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994