Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Maggio

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 19, 1993PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

We transferred this case from the Appeals Court on our own motion to determine whether proceedings in a District Court which terminated the defendant’s probationary status complied with the standards of due process ap plicable to probation revocation hearings. We conclude that they did not. Accordingly, we vacate the guilty findings that were entered and the sentences imposed on the defendant.

The following are the pertinent facts. On November 27, 1990, in the Cambridge Division of the District Court Department, the defendant, in accordance with the procedure established in Commonwealth v.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. DurlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. DuquetteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Rubera v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HolmgrenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  2. Commonwealth v. WilcoxMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
  3. Commonwealth v. JoynerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
  4. Commonwealth v. MorseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. NegronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API