Stadler v. Rohm
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
One issue is dispositive of this appeal: Did respondents, by their actions, affirm the contract be tween the parties, thus precluding their right to the equitable remedy of rescission? The appellant concedes that the evidence supports the trial court’s findings that three misrepresentations were made as inducements to the plaintiffs-respondents’ entering into the contract for the purchase of the Guest House Motel. He concedes the materiality of the misrepresentation that there were 40 rooms, whereas in truth there were only 39, and the further misrepresentation involving the understatement of…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Farrar v. ChurchillSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Jacobsen v. WhitelyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
- Kaiser v. NummerdorWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
- Clausen v. HeadWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
- Peters v. KellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Olympia Hotels Corp. v. Johnson Wax Development Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- Wiebke v. Richardson & Sons, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Baumgarten v. BubolzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1981
- Gaugert v. DuveCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Schwabe v. Chantilly, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.